Photo by David Marcu via Unsplash

EU citizenship for sale?

Author
Laure Brillaud
Date
15 June, 2017
Type
Article
Share

Following the 2008 financial crisis, we have seen new kinds of investor schemes blossoming across Europe.  Their names and modalities differ from one Member State to the other – the Tier 1 investor visa in the UK, the Autorização de Residência para Atividade de Investimento (translated as Golden Residence Permit Programme) in Portugal, the Scheme for Naturalization of Investors in Cyprus by exception in Cyprus (obviously), or the Individual Investor Programme in Malta – but the objective is the same: offering fast-track residency or even citizenship to third-country nationals in return for investments in the national economy.  

These money-for-passports programmes targeted at wealthy individuals investing in the country above a certain threshold impose quite light eligibility criteria. And when conditions are required, they are not always followed in practice. For example, the Portuguese Golden Residence Permit Programme was diverted from its initial purpose to foster employment creation to encourage investment in high-value property. One can doubt that the requirement to create ten jobs is respected in most cases.  

Although, increased foreign investment in key economic sectors in Member States may seem very welcome, it also raises serious concerns that these schemes may offer easy access and legitimate cover for money launderers wishing to introduce substantial amounts of illicit money in the market. Transparency International has documented how these schemes operate from the perspective of the corruption and money-laundering risks that they pose. Read more about the UK Tier 1 investor scheme, the Portuguese Golden Residence Permit Programme (page 50), the Hungarian Residency Bond Scheme.  It has been also relayed in a number of media articles

This is a European issue that should be addressed at EU level. Indeed, all these investment schemes essentially rely on their capacity to offer free access to the Schengen area, a benefit which is often advertised upfront as one of the key selling points. We call on the European Commission to assess the risks and threats that those schemes pose to its financial system and provide an appropriate policy response.

Related Projects

Enhancing Beneficial Ownership Transparency

The ‘Panama Papers’ of 2016 were a widely discussed phenomenon. But, what did they actually tell us that we didn’t already know? That the global financial system is plagued by shady practices and secrecy? This is a well-known tale.

Resources

Under the shell: Ending money laundering in Europe

This report assesses the national anti-money laundering framework in six European countries: Czech Republic, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Portugal and Slovenia. It focuses on beneficial ownership transparency, a key aspect of the fight against money laundering and corporate secrecy.

Want to know more? Get in touch

Laure Brillaud

Policy Officer – Anti-Money Laundering
lbrillaud@transparency.org