OVERFISHING IN THE DARKNESS A case study on transparency in EU council decision-making


“Overfishing in the darkness” is a nine month project aimed at increasing the transparency of Council decision-making using the upcoming negotiations on fishing quotas for 2017 as a case study. The project started in April 2016 and will run till the end of the year.*


Full Report





The full report “Overfishing in the darkness: a case study on transparency in Council decision-making” can be found here.


Around half of EU fish stocks in the Atlantic are currently over-exploited. Unsustainable fishing costs costs millions of euros in lost revenue and jobs and causes enormous ecological damage.

The Council of the EU is responsible for setting fishing limits and plays a crucial role in reducing overfishing in the waters of North-West Europe. In the last 15 years EU fisheries ministers have repeatedly agreed on fishing quotas at an average of 20% higher than sustainable scientifically-advised limits.

A lack of transparency means we don’t know which countries favour which limits in the Council. Transparency is vital to ensure that politicians are accountable and that the decisions they make are in the public interest.

EU fisheries’ ministers will soon sit down together again to negotiate fishing limits for 2017. Fish are a public resource and citizens should have the right to know how the decisions which affect our seas, jobs and food come about and what positions countries hold. The decision-making process should be more transparent by making Member State positions and their reasoning public.


by Hernan Pinera


The case study shows that the lack of transparency and accountability can have real and detrimental effects on the quality of decisions. Despite the recent reform of the Common Fisheries Policy, overfishing and depletion of EU fish stocks is continuing at alarming rates. The results of this study confirm that the Council is lagging a long way behind other EU institutions in terms of transparency.

We developed a questionnaire which was distributed to the 28 Permanent Representations of EU Member States to assess their views on various practical aspects of increasing the transparency of the Council. In it, we ask them what they think about the publication of minutes, access to information requests and the live-streaming of sessions.

As of early October 2016, eleven countries have submitted their responses to the survey and three are in the process of responding.

Response rate to TI EU online survey (last updated on 1 October 2016):



The report presents the results of a questionnaire among Member States on their positions to increased transparency of AGRIFISH negotiations in particular and the Council more generally. Only a small number of Member States have come out in favour of ambitious reform.

A more detailed list of concrete recommendations can be found here.



EVENT: a Net of Secrecy? Transparency in the Council of the EU

Catch 22: How can we make Council negotiations on fishing quotas more transparent?

Casting the net: How can we increase the transparency of Council decision-making?


Want to know more? Get in touch

Yannik Bendel
EU Policy Officer



*With financial support from The Pew Charitable Trusts